From Black Gold to Digital Gold: The Parallel Rise of Oil and Data

Lorem Ipsum has been the industry’s standard dummy text ever since the 1500s.

The Genesis of Global Power: A Concise Summary

The historical trajectories of oil and data reveal striking parallels in their evolution from niche commodities to global power drivers, while also highlighting fundamental differences that shape their unique impacts on society, economics, and geopolitics. Understanding these patterns offers crucial insights for navigating our resource-dependent future.

Birth Through Commercialization

Both industries trace their commercial genesis to the mid-19th century, when technological breakthroughs transformed previously limited resources into scalable industrial engines. The parallel timing is remarkable: while Joseph Marie Jacquard’s 1804 punched card loom provided early programmability concepts, and Samuel Kier began bottling Pennsylvania petroleum as medicine in 1847, true industrial birth required revolutionary extraction and processing capabilities.

For oil, Edwin Drake’s August 27, 1859 well near Titusville, Pennsylvania marked the pivotal moment when extraction became commercially viable at scale. Production skyrocketed from 2,000 barrels in 1859 to 500,000 barrels by 1865—a 25,000% increase in just six years. The first oil refinery opened in 1861, initially producing kerosene as a superior illuminant to whale oil.

Similarly, data’s industrial birth came through Herman Hollerith’s late 1880s electromechanical tabulating machines using punched cards, which revolutionized the 1890 U.S. census, completing it two years faster than the previous one. This wasn’t merely an efficiency gain—it represented the first time massive datasets could be processed systematically at scale.

These parallel origins reveal a crucial insight: the true birth of an industry isn’t marked by a resource’s first discovery or use, but by the technological innovation that enables its efficient extraction, processing, and distribution at commercial scale. Drake’s “Conductor Pipe” for oil and Hollerith’s punched card system for data were the catalysts that unlocked previously unattainable economic potential.

Key Difference: While oil’s commercial viability depended on overcoming physical extraction challenges, data’s breakthrough centered on processing and analysis capabilities—foreshadowing their divergent economic models.

Infrastructure as Industrial Backbone

Both industries required robust infrastructure development to achieve sustained growth and global reach, though their physical versus digital nature created distinct requirements. For oil, pipelines emerged as “the most common, safest, and cheapest” method for long-distance transport, complemented by rail, marine vessels, and storage facilities. This physical infrastructure transformed oil from a localized commodity into a globally traded resource, with the Trans-Alaska Pipeline alone moving 17 billion barrels since 1977.

Data required increasingly sophisticated networks, evolving from early telegraph systems to modern fiber optics supporting speeds exceeding 100Gbps. Today’s data centers are transitioning to 400Gbps and 800Gbps Ethernet speeds, with hyperscale facilities consuming as much electricity as entire cities. Amazon’s AWS alone operates 99 Availability Zones across 31 geographic regions, creating a global digital pipeline system.

This infrastructure development wasn’t merely supportive but fundamentally enabling—the arteries through which these resources flowed to realize their full economic potential. Without pipelines, oil remained trapped at extraction sites. Without global networks and cloud computing, data couldn’t be transmitted, processed, and leveraged at scale.

Transition Point: As infrastructure matured, both industries experienced rapid consolidation as companies sought to control these critical arteries.

Market Consolidation and Integration

Both industries experienced periods of intense consolidation driven by the pursuit of efficiency and market control, though data’s consolidation happened far more rapidly. Following the initial oil boom, John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil aggressively pursued horizontal integration (acquiring competitors) and vertical integration (controlling the entire supply chain). This strategy proved devastatingly effective—Standard Oil controlled 90% of U.S. oil refining by the 1880s while simultaneously reducing kerosene prices from 58 cents to 26 cents between 1865 and 1870.

However, this dominance faced challenges: the 1901 Spindletop gusher in Texas ended any potential Standard Oil monopoly, leading to over 1,500 new oil companies within a year. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately ordered Standard Oil’s dissolution in 1911 under antitrust laws, breaking it into 38 separate companies.

The data industry has witnessed even more dramatic consolidation over a much shorter timeframe. Hollerith’s Tabulating Machine Company became IBM’s foundational core in 1924, processing records for 26 million Social Security workers by 1935. But modern data consolidation accelerated exponentially: Google processes over 8.5 billion searches daily (92% market share), Amazon controls 32% of global cloud infrastructure, and Meta’s platforms connect 3.96 billion monthly active users. These companies integrated across digital services faster than oil companies ever could across physical infrastructure.

Critical Insight: In nascent, rapidly expanding resource industries, initial fragmentation and overproduction create conditions ripe for consolidation. Companies that achieve economies of scale gain immense competitive advantages, whether through Rockefeller’s refining efficiency or Google’s search algorithm improvements.

Yet data’s network effects—where each new user increases the system’s overall value—accelerated consolidation beyond anything the oil industry experienced, creating what economists call “winner-take-all” markets.

Demand-Side Innovation as Market Transformer

External technological catalysts dramatically shifted product value and industry direction for both resources, though data’s transformations occurred in rapid succession rather than single pivotal moments. For oil, the early 1900s invention and mass adoption of the internal combustion engine and automobile transformed gasoline from a “useless by-product” of the refining process into its primary and most valuable output. By 1910, automotive fuel demand had outstripped kerosene, spurring development of thermal cracking and sophisticated refining processes using catalysts during the 1930s-WWII period to improve fuel quality for high-performance combat aircraft.

Data experienced multiple transformation waves in quick succession. The 1946 ENIAC computer and 1947 transistor invention enabled the Information Age. The 1951 UNIVAC I became the first American commercial computer for business use. Edgar F. Codd’s 1970 relational database development at IBM organized data into tables, enabling efficient analysis. Then Tim Berners-Lee’s 1989 World Wide Web proposal democratized information access when it became publicly available in 1991.

The acceleration continued: the 1995-2001 dot-com boom brought widespread internet adoption and e-commerce giants like Amazon and eBay. By 1997, NASA researchers coined “big data” to describe data overwhelming storage systems. The 1999 “Internet of Things” concept and 2004 Facebook launch preceded massive data expansion—from 2 zettabytes globally in 2010 to 120 zettabytes by 2023, with 90% of the world’s data created in just the last two years.

The current AI boom exemplifies this pattern: ChatGPT reached 100 million users in just two months, creating massive demand for both training data and computational infrastructure. Microsoft invested $13 billion in OpenAI, while NVIDIA’s data center revenue jumped from $3 billion in 2022 to $47.5 billion in 2024, driven entirely by AI demand.

Pattern Recognition: Breakthroughs in adjacent industries can fundamentally redefine a resource’s value proposition, creating entirely new markets unforeseen at the industry’s birth. The difference is data’s transformations happen in years rather than decades.

Strategic Resource Control and Geopolitical Power

Both resources became foundational to national power and economic prosperity, though through markedly different control mechanisms that reflect their physical versus digital nature. Oil’s strategic importance crystallized during World Wars I and II, when military innovations like submarines, tanks, and airplanes became entirely dependent on petroleum. Winston Churchill’s decision to convert the British Navy from coal to oil before WWI exemplified this strategic shift.

This cemented oil security as a top foreign and domestic policy priority. The 1917 Russian nationalization following the Bolshevik Revolution marked early resource nationalism, followed by Mexico’s 1938 nationalization. The 1960 formation of OPEC by Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Venezuela, and Kuwait challenged Western oil company dominance. By 1976, virtually every major producer in the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and Latin America had nationalized at least some oil production.

The 1973 Arab oil embargo demonstrated oil’s geopolitical weapon potential, quadrupling prices in three months. The 1979 Iranian Revolution doubled prices again. OPEC’s 2016 expansion into OPEC+ (including Russia) now controls approximately 55% of global oil supply, while recent events like Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have again highlighted energy security’s critical importance—European gas prices spiked 1,000% in 2022.

Data’s Different Power Model

Data’s strategic importance revolves around algorithmic governance, digital sovereignty, and information control rather than territorial control. China’s Great Firewall and data localization laws, the EU’s Digital Services Act, and the ongoing US-TikTok saga illustrate how nations are asserting digital sovereignty. Unlike oil fields, data’s value lies not in possession but in processing capability and algorithmic insight.

The concentration of data processing in tech giants has created new forms of power. Google’s search algorithm influences what billions see, while social media platforms can shape political discourse—capabilities that transcend traditional territorial boundaries.

Modern Example: The Russia-Ukraine conflict highlighted both resources’ strategic nature simultaneously, with cyber warfare targeting data infrastructure while physical conflicts disrupted oil supplies.

The Fundamental Divergence: Scarcity vs. Abundance

Despite their parallel trajectories, oil and data diverge fundamentally in their intrinsic nature, creating distinct economic models and regulatory challenges that become more pronounced over time.

Oil: The Scarcity Model

Oil operates on traditional scarcity economics. It’s a tangible, finite commodity with physical extraction limits, geological constraints, and depletion upon use. Its value chain involves physical extraction, transportation, refinement, and consumption. Peak oil theory suggests ultimate production limits, while extraction becomes more expensive as easily accessible reserves diminish.

Data: The Abundance Model

Data operates on network effects and increasing returns to scale. It’s an intangible, infinitely reproducible asset that grows through use rather than depleting. The same dataset can simultaneously train multiple AI models, inform countless business decisions, and generate endless insights without degradation. Its value derives not from scarcity but from analysis, combination, and application.

The “5 V’s of Big Data”—Volume (massive scale), Velocity (real-time processing), Variety (multiple formats), Veracity (data quality), and Value (actionable insights)—encapsulate data’s unique characteristics that traditional commodity economics cannot adequately explain.

Economic Implications: Oil companies focus on reserve acquisition and extraction efficiency, while data companies focus on collection, processing, and insight generation. Oil wealth concentrates in resource-rich nations; data wealth concentrates wherever processing and analysis capabilities exist.

Ethical Evolution and Regulatory Response

As both industries matured, they faced increasing ethical scrutiny and regulatory oversight, though targeting different harms and stakeholder concerns.

Oil’s Environmental Reckoning

Oil’s ethical challenges center on environmental impact and climate change. The industry’s own scientists began raising climate concerns in the 1950s, with Shell’s 1959 article affirming that burning fossil fuels “might conceivably change the climate.” Internal company documents reveal that ExxonMobil’s scientists accurately predicted global warming impacts, yet the industry funded climate denial campaigns for decades until the late 1990s-early 2000s, when companies began publicly acknowledging climate science.

This has led to extensive environmental regulation, carbon pricing mechanisms, and litigation—with over 2,000 climate lawsuits filed globally by 2024. The industry also faces scrutiny over human rights violations in resource extraction, from Nigeria’s oil conflicts to corruption in petrostates. Environmental disasters like oil spills crystallized public opposition.

Data’s Privacy and Power Concerns

Data’s ethical challenges center on privacy, algorithmic bias, surveillance capitalism, and democratic governance. The concept of “information explosion” emerged as early as 1944 when librarian Fremont Rider estimated university libraries were doubling every 16 years. But real concerns surfaced with mass data collection capabilities.

The Cambridge Analytica scandal revealed how personal data could manipulate political processes, while studies show AI systems perpetuating racial and gender biases. Comprehensive regulations like GDPR (implemented May 2018) in Europe and CCPA (effective 2020) in California grant individuals rights over their personal data and impose obligations on organizations. The EU’s Digital Services Act and proposed AI Act represent attempts to govern algorithmic systems.

However, the digital divide has emerged as a critical equity issue, with 2.9 billion people still lacking internet access, exacerbating existing inequalities in education, employment, and healthcare.

Regulatory Divergence: Oil regulation focuses primarily on environmental protection and market competition, while data regulation grapples with fundamental questions about privacy, democracy, and human autonomy in digital societies.

Future Trajectories: Energy Transition vs. AI Acceleration

The industries’ futures reflect their fundamental differences while both remaining central to global power structures.

Oil’s Managed Decline and Transformation

Oil faces an unprecedented challenge: maintaining energy security while transitioning to renewables. The 2013 domestic oil boom from fracking created pipeline capacity shortages, spurring crude oil rail transport. However, environmental pressures continue mounting. The International Energy Agency projects oil demand could peak by 2030 if climate policies succeed, yet $12 trillion in oil and gas infrastructure exists globally, creating a “stranded assets” problem.

Oil’s role may evolve rather than disappear—petrochemicals, aviation fuel, and industrial processes will likely require hydrocarbons for decades. Advanced extraction technologies like enhanced oil recovery and carbon capture could extend the industry’s relevance while reducing environmental impact. The industry must navigate between maintaining current operations and preparing for a lower-carbon future.

Data’s Exponential Expansion

Data’s growth trajectory shows no signs of slowing, with projected annual generation surging from 120 zettabytes in 2023 to over 180 zettabytes by 2025. AI development requires exponentially more training data—GPT-4 used an estimated 45TB of text data, while future models may need petabytes. The Internet of Things promises to connect 75 billion devices by 2025, while edge computing brings data processing closer to generation points.

The central challenges involve establishing governance frameworks that balance innovation with individual rights, ensuring equitable access to digital opportunities, and addressing the ethical implications of increasingly sophisticated AI systems. Quantum computing may revolutionize both data processing capabilities and cybersecurity requirements, creating yet another transformation wave in data’s rapid evolution.

Conclusion: Three Key Predictions for Resource Power

Understanding these parallel evolutions and fundamental differences suggests three critical developments:

First, data will increasingly determine national competitiveness more than natural resource endowments. Countries with advanced AI capabilities, robust digital infrastructure, and skilled populations will gain systematic advantages regardless of their oil reserves.

Second, both resources will face “peak governance” challenges—the point where existing regulatory frameworks prove inadequate for managing their societal impacts. Oil’s climate regulations and data’s AI governance represent the beginning, not the end, of this regulatory evolution.

Third, the intersection of these resources will create new power dynamics. AI systems optimizing energy grids, predictive analytics for oil exploration, and smart city infrastructure will blur the boundaries between digital and physical resource control.

The companies and nations that master both the parallels and the divergences between these resources will shape the next century of global power. The age of resource competition hasn’t ended—it has simply expanded from underground reserves to algorithmic capabilities.


Appendix A: Detailed Timeline – Oil and Data from Birth to Boom (1804-Present)

Early Precursors & Foundations

1804 (Data): Joseph Marie Jacquard develops a loom controlled by punched cards, an early form of programmability and automated control.

1845 (Oil): Englishman Robert Beart invents the first rotary drill.

c. 1847 (Oil): Samuel M. Kier begins bottling and selling petroleum medicinally in Pennsylvania.

1855 (Oil): The Pennsylvania Rock Oil Company is formed by George Henry Bissell and investors, seeking a more efficient replacement for asphalt-based kerosene. Benjamin Silliman Jr. confirms oil’s potential as an illuminant.

The Birth of Industries (Mid-19th Century)

August 27, 1859 (Oil): Edwin Drake successfully drills the first commercial oil well near Titusville, Pennsylvania, marking the birth of the modern commercial oil industry. Production in Pennsylvania surges from 2,000 barrels in 1859 to 500,000 barrels by 1865.

1861 (Oil): The first oil refinery opens, primarily producing kerosene, tar, and naphtha (an early form of gasoline). Kerosene becomes a superior illuminant.

1866 (Oil): Peter Sweeney introduces rotary drilling to the American oil industry, improving upon a British patent.

Late 1880s (Data): Herman Hollerith invents a system for data storage on machine-readable punched cards, along with the tabulator and keypunch machine, using electromechanical relays and counters.

1890 (Data): Hollerith’s method is famously applied in the U.S. census, processing data two years faster than the previous census.

1895 (Oil): The Baker brothers use the rotary method for oil well drilling in the Corsicana field of Navarro County, Texas.

Early 20th Century: Consolidation, Diversification, and Computing Foundations

1901 (Oil): The Spindletop oil gusher in Texas effectively ends any potential Standard Oil monopoly, leading to the chartering of over 1,500 oil companies within a year.

Early 1900s (Oil): Increasing sales of gasoline for automobiles and airplanes create a vast new market for what was previously a “useless by-product” of oil refining.

1910 (Oil): Demand for automotive fuel outstrips kerosene, spurring the development of thermal cracking to increase gasoline yields from heavier oils.

1911 (Oil): The U.S. Supreme Court orders the dissolution of the Standard Oil Trust under antitrust laws, separating its 38 controlled companies into individual firms.

1917 (Oil): Russia nationalizes its oil production following the Bolshevik Revolution, one of the first major successful oil nationalizations.

1920 (Data): Electromechanical tabulating machines can add, subtract, and print totals.

1924 (Data): Hollerith’s Tabulating Machine Company becomes the foundational core of International Business Machines Corporation (IBM).

1929 (Oil): The first true horizontal oil well is drilled near Texon, Texas.

1929-1930 (Oil): John Eastman patents Directional Drilling, allowing access to oil reserves at various angles.

1931 (Oil): The price of oil plummets to ten cents a barrel due to the onset of the Great Depression and overproduction from the East Texas oil field.

1935 (Data): IBM systems process records for 26 million Social Security workers.

1938 (Oil): Mexico nationalizes its oil industry, another early successful nationalization.

1930s-WWII (Oil): Sophisticated refining processes using catalysts (e.g., catalytic cracking, alkylation) are developed to improve fuel quality and supply for transportation fuels, especially high-performance combat aircraft.

1944 (Data): Librarian Fremont Rider coins the concept of an “information explosion,” estimating university libraries are doubling in size every 16 years.

1946 (Data): The Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer (ENIAC), one of the first programmable electronic computers, is dedicated at the University of Pennsylvania.

1947 (Data): The invention of the transistor by John Bardeen and Walter Houser Brattain at Bell Labs enables computer miniaturization and propels the Information Age.

1948 (Data): Claude Shannon publishes “A Mathematical Theory of Communication,” laying conceptual groundwork for digitalization.

1950s (Oil): Offshore drilling progresses with sophisticated jackup rigs and deep-ocean operations.

1950s (Oil): Oil industry scientists begin raising concerns about oil’s impacts on climate, with Shell’s 1959 article affirming that burning fossil fuels “might conceivably change the climate.”

1951 (Data): The UNIVAC I, the first American commercial computer designed for business use, is delivered to the Census Bureau.

1954 (Data): The first UNIVAC for business applications is installed at General Electric Appliance Division for payroll.

Mid-20th Century to Present: Global Dominance and Exponential Growth

1960 (Oil): Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Venezuela, and Kuwait form the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to coordinate policies and stabilize prices, challenging the dominance of the “Seven Sisters” oil companies.

1960s (Oil): As nations decolonize, many seek to nationalize their oil resources.

1970 (Data): Edgar F. Codd develops the relational database at IBM, organizing data into tables and enabling efficient analysis with Structured Query Language (SQL).

October 1973 (Oil): Arab members of OPEC (OAPEC) announce an oil embargo against the U.S. and other countries, quadrupling oil prices in three months and causing widespread fuel shortages.

1970s (Data): The first personal computers are developed, with IBM introducing the IBM 5100 in 1975 and Apple releasing the Apple II in 1977, democratizing computing.

1976 (Oil): Virtually every major producer in the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and Latin America has nationalized at least some of their oil production.

1979 (Oil): A second oil crisis erupts following the Iranian Revolution, causing oil prices to double.

1989 (Data): Tim Berners-Lee publishes a proposal for an information network that would become the World Wide Web.

1991 (Data): The World Wide Web becomes publicly accessible.

1995-2001 (Data): The dot-com boom sees rapid technological advancements, widespread internet adoption, and an explosion of online businesses, including e-commerce giants like Amazon, eBay, and Netflix.

1997 (Data): The term “big data” is first used by NASA researchers to describe data overwhelming networks and storage systems. Social media platforms like Six Degrees launch.

1999 (Data): The term “Internet of Things” (IoT) is coined, as digital sensors revolutionize tracking products in global supply chains.

Late 1990s – Early 2000s (Oil): Oil companies begin publicly acknowledging climate change science and promoting market-based solutions.

2004 (Data): Google publishes a paper describing BigTable, a distributed storage system for big data. Facebook launches.

2008 (Data): Apache Software launches Hadoop, a distributed computing solution.

2008-2015 (Oil): The fracking revolution transforms U.S. oil production, making America the world’s largest oil producer.

2010 (Data): The world produces approximately 2 zettabytes of data.

2011 (Data): Annual sales of personal computers peak at 362 million units.

2013 (Oil): Crude oil movements by rail spike due to a domestic oil boom and insufficient pipeline capacity.

2016 (Oil): OPEC expands its influence by forming OPEC+, including Russia and other non-OPEC producers, controlling approximately 55% of global oil supply.

May 2018 (Data): The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is implemented in Europe, standardizing data privacy laws and empowering EU citizens with data rights.

2020 (Data): The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) goes into effect, protecting California residents’ data rights.

2020 (Oil): Oil prices briefly turn negative during COVID-19 pandemic as demand collapses and storage fills up.

November 2022 (Data): OpenAI releases ChatGPT, triggering the current AI boom and unprecedented demand for training data and computing infrastructure.

2023 (Data): Global data production skyrockets to 120 zettabytes, with 90% of the world’s data produced in the last two years. NVIDIA’s data center revenue grows from $3 billion to $47.5 billion in two years.

2024 (Oil): Russia-Ukraine conflict causes European gas prices to spike 1,000%, highlighting continued energy security importance.

2025 (Data – Projected): Total annual data generation is anticipated to surge to over 180 zettabytes.

Present (Oil & Data): Both industries continue to evolve, with oil facing environmental scrutiny and energy transition pressures, while data grapples with AI governance, privacy rights, and the challenge of managing exponential growth.

Leave a Comment